In the future of Tikok, the role of Oracle goes to Capital Hill Scrutiny

Since the questions about the future of Tikokkok are going on around Washington, the name of a possible suiter for the popular video app keeps onwards: Oracle.

On Tuesday, Oracle met with top colleagues on Capital Hill, how to talk about how the US Tech veteran, which processes and serves the Tikok user data, plan to work with Chinese-owned video apps in the United States in the coming weeks, according to two people with knowledge of the meeting, who were not authorized to speak publicly.

This question came when Tiktok stares the deadline of April 5 for a federal law that restrictions its distribution in the country if it is not sold to a non-seani owner. Tikok’s owner is Chinese internet company bidence, and its Chinese relations have questioned whether the app is a national security threat in the United States.

In Tuesday’s meeting, colleagues also raised the subject whether the company was interacting with the White House on a deal recently, will involve the tickek, one of the people said. Allies sought assurance from Oracle that any deal would follow the law.

The meeting, which was requested by colleagues, included House Selection Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, the office of Speaker Mike Johnson and employees for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, two people said with the knowledge of the meeting.

Tikok is facing another political scuffle on its future. In January, President Trump delayed the enforcement of law, which would ban Tiktok from the United States, which passed the Congress with bipartisan support and was unanimously retained by the Supreme Court. Mr. Trump has promised to make a deal for the app to protect national security, and exploited Vice President JD Vance in February to find a system to save it.

Oracle is a natural contender who is part of a deal for Tiktok. The company is already a technical partner of Tiktok in the United States, and it bids for the app when President Trump demanded to force sales from bidence in his first term.

The White House, not the Congress, will eventually decide whether a deal for Tikok could move forward. It is not clear whether Oracle is currently interested in the app. Tiktok and Oracle refused to comment. The White House also did not immediately respond to the remarks request.

As an approach of the April 5 deadline, Republican MPs and other China Hawks who have supported the law have expressed concern that Tiktok and Bidens can try to attack a deal with the Trump administration that will maintain Chinese effects on the app and its powerful algorithm.

MPs say that a deal that does not meet the needs of the law will reduce national security and can give rise to shareholder cases against technology companies distributing and hosting Tiktok in the United States.

“The law is clear: any deal should end the Chinese influence and control on the app to protect our interests,” the representative John Mulanar, a Michigan Republican who presided over the House Committee, focused on China, wrote in an opinion column on Tuesday. National Review. He said that he was “committed to ensure that any deal with Ticketkok meets the clear statutory requirements set by the Congress.”

Mr. Vance told NBC News last week that till April 5 “will definitely be a high-level agreement that I think our national security satisfies the concerns, allowing it to be a separate American ticket enterprise.”

Mr. Trump said this month that when he was optimistic that the Tiktok would make a deal before the deadline, he was open to extend the deadline.

Larry Alison, a co-founder and chief technology officer of Oracle, joined Sri Trump for an announcement about an artificial intelligence initiative of $ 100 billion in January. In this program, Mr. Trump mentioned that Elon Musk or Oracle Ticketkok could buy and insisted on “the right to deal”.

In implementing the law, Mr. Trump’s stagnation has raised questions about whether the Presidents are following the rule of the law or increasing the limit of executive power. Some experts have said that conflict represents the onset of a constitutional crisis.

Tikok has argued for at least one year that the company’s sales would be impossible, as the Chinese government will not allow the export of all important algorithms of Tikok.