EU AI rules delay the tech rollout, but civil society says that security comes first. Tekrepablak

Tech companies are adamant that the regulation of artificial intelligence in the European Union is preventing its citizens from reaching the latest and greatest products. However, many civil society groups otherwise felt, maintaining that AI developers need to produce products that maintain their customers’ safety and privacy.

Some tech giants delayed in European Union

There are many examples where the launch of AI products in the European Union is either delayed or canceled as a result of rules. For example, this week, 4 series of Meta’s Lama 4AI models were released everywhere except Europe. Its AI chatbots integrated into WhatsApp, Messenger and Instagram

Similarly, Google’s AI overviews currently appear in only eight member states, which came out of states after nine months, and both its Bard and Gemini models delayed European release. Apple Intelligence has become available in the European Union only with the release of iOS 18.4, “Release in the region after” regulatory uncertainties brought by the Digital Markets Act “.

“If some companies cannot guarantee that their AI products respect the law, consumers are not missing; these are products that are not yet safe to be released on the European Union market,” Sabstian Pant, Deputy Chief of Communications in the European Consumer Organization BUC said, said, Uronuse,

“It is not for the law to bow down to the new features rolled out by technical companies. Instead it is for companies to ensure that new features, products or technologies comply with existing laws, before they hit the European Union market.”

See: AI Act of European Union: Europe’s new rules for Artificial Intelligence

European Union rules push companies to make more privacy-conscious equipment

The European Union law has not always excluded citizens of the European Union out of AI products; Instead, it has often forced tech companies to customize and distribute better, more privacy-conscious solutions for them. For example:

• The X agreed to permanently process personal data from the public positions of European Union users to train its AI model groc after the Data Protection Commission moved to court.
• The Chinese AI model, Deepsek, was banned in Italy about how it handled the data of its citizens.
• Last June, Mata delayed training of its big language model on public content shared on Facebook and Instagram, as the European Union regulators suggested that it may require clear consent from the material owners, and it has not yet resumed.

A data protection lawyer Kalenthi Sardeli, a data protection that works with advocacy group Noyb, told Euronws that users usually do not guess their public positions being used to train the AI ​​model, yet it is right what many technical companies are doing, often with very little relationship for transparency. “The right to data protection is a fundamental human right and it should be taken into consideration when designing and deploying the AI ​​tool.”

Google, Meta claims that EU AI law harms citizens, but their revenue is also at stake

Google and Meta openly criticized AI’s European regulation, suggesting that it will reduce the innovation capacity of the region.

Last year, Google published a report stating how Europe passes through other global superpowers when it comes to AI innovation. It was found that only 34% of the European Union businesses used cloud computing technologies in 2022, an important environment for AI development, which is behind the European Commission’s 75% target by 2030. Europe also filed only 2% of the global AI patent in 2022, while China and the US, the top two largest producers, respectively filed 61% and 21%.

The report greatly blamed the rules of the European Union for the struggles of the region to innovate in advanced technologies. Since 2019, the European Union has introduced more than 100 pieces of the digital economy and society affecting the digital economy and society. This is not just a sheer number of rules that are a challenge that is a challenge – it is complexity. ” blog post“Regulatory-Moving from the first perspective can help unlock the AI ​​opportunity.”

But Google, Meta, and other technical giants stand to suffer financially if the rules prevent them from launching products in the European Union, as the region represents a huge market with 448 million people. On the other hand, if they proceed with the launch, but break the rules, they can face heavy fines of € 35 million or 7% global business in case of the AI ​​Act.

Europe is currently entangled in several regulatory battles with major technical firms in the US, many of which have already imposed adequate fines. In February, Meta announced that it was designed to raise its concerns, which was directly seen as an inappropriate regulation for the US President.

US President Donald Trump referred to the penalty as “a form of taxation” at the World Economic Forum in January. In a speech in February Paris AI Action SummitAmerican Vice President Vance disliked Europe’s use of “excessive regulation” and said the international approach should “promote it rather than promoting the creation of AI technology.”